I’m not sure what is more appalling to me about her; that she continues to ignore the will of the 75% of the voters of her home state or that she casts the most stupid and harmful votes that only that pathetic weasel Lieberman could love.

Her latest vote to condem a f’ing advertisement in the NYTimes is so unbelievably appalling that I cannot stand it. In the first place, I’d be willing to bet that 95% of her constituents had not even heard of the ad. In the 2nd place considering that 75% of Californians want this war over and cannot stand bush and his latest minion, they’d (we’d) be in favor of the sentiments of the ad. So, as if wasting Congress’ time debating and voting in favor of a resolution condemning an _AD_ wasn’t bad enough, it went against the sentiments of the people of that she is supposed to represent.

It’s the logic of her ‘compromising’ that escapes me and pisses me off. She votes in favor of condemning an ad. She votes in favor of bush’s spying on Americans (again despite the fact that 70-80% of her constituents are opposed). She votes in favor of funding this war. (See above about the wishes of her constituents). She votes in favor of bush’s appointees (see above.)

Her votes make no sense to me. Her votes make no sense in the context of her constiuents, i.e. the people that she is supposed to represent. Her votes make no sense in the context of logic.

Not surprisingly, she ignores calls and emails to her office condemning her actions.

 

Diane Feinstein just makes me sick. I’d almost rather a republican in that seat than her. At least a republican’s vote choices would make sense in a bizarro sort of way. Her decisions make no sense at all. And, she doesn’t feel that she needs to explain herself either. It’s time for Feinstein to sink back into the abyss from which she came.